But there are not that many around anymore.Īdobe is not making the life of plug-in makers easy by constantly modifying the UI or structure so the plug-ins won't work anymore or by incorporating their idea/plug-in into their own product. Isolating an object from a background is typically a difficult and time-consuming task, however ReMask simplifies the process with its intuitive tools to help you quickly make extractions. Still, some plug-ins are better then Photoshop and they still survive. Topaz ReMask About Topaz ReMask Topaz ReMask is a masking and extraction tool that makes it easy to extract elements from your digital im-ages. I also did a quick manual job where the blue channel was duped and levels adjusted. Neither one of them did a perfect job, but GML left some of the sea oats intact where topaz remask wiped them out completely. Yes, over the years Photoshop made some plug-ins obsolete by incorporating that idea or technique. I used a picture of the top of sand dunes with sea oats (plants) on top against the blue sky. It’s not surprising that Topaz is doing what the posters are complaining about. So, it is a hard time to be a company trying to make Photoshop plugins. Over the years Photoshop has gotten better and better and doing things you used to have to buy a plugin to do (HDR, noise reduction, focus stacking, sharpening, upscaling, etc), and many of the companies have folded and the existing products are comparatively more expensive and come without lifetime free upgrades. For awhile, there were many plugins that would do things that you just couldn’t do in Photoshop (or LR), and often several competing competing companies offering the same function. I have been using Photoshop since version 4, and the plugin market has gone through a lot of changes. any alternatives, as plugins for Photoshop? Remask is already available in Studio (though for the life of me, I can't get it to work in the same way as standalone).Īnyway, back to the original question. Gradually, they will all be integrated and no longer be available separately. Some are now only available in Studio, some are available separately. It adds too many extra steps to get to where you need to be.Īlso, of all of Topaz's applications, it seems that Remask would be the least likely to be migrated to Studio. The only argument against is if Studio slows things down to an unacceptable level. If you use a single product (like remask), it is the most clunky stupid way to work. Opening the image in Topaz Remask 3, It was a simple task of painting red what I. Studio may be wonderful for people who use lots of effects. Computer user accounts now store saved effects separately for each. ![]() ![]() No, they've significantly changed the product to force you into an unnecessary wrapper, whether you want it or not. You will gain rather than lose functionality. Support and updates will continue just you have to use Studio. Standalone plugin support has been completely dropped. So we recommend simply using the adjustments in Studio to save your system resources from running multiple programs. All future plugin upgrades you will find in Studio. Your plugins will continue to work with a host editor like Photoshop or Lightroom.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |